Strategy Analysis Go Fundamentally Astray - 1526 Words

...In fact, such straightforward definitions (of strategy) go fundamentally astray, for strategy is a process, a constant adaptation to shifting conditions and circumstances in a world where chance uncertainty, and ambiguity dominate. At the outset of the course on the making of strategy we were asked to define strategy. This attempt early on showed the complexities of defining strategy as is evidenced by the opening quote from the book. The process grew rapidly more complex as more readings and perspectives were added. However, approaching the end of the course a handle appeared that would at least allow the student to grasp the basics and speak intelligently in defining strategy. The definition landed upon by this author was made up†¦show more content†¦This focus was seen in the opening of the book when the authors wrote, Consequently, reality weds strategic planning tightly to its larger context. Though they go on to speak of political objectives, as well as diplomatic and economic the need for focus is still present. The Athenians used this process in their open air assemblies where, for all practical purposes, every decision down to the number of ships to be used and the goal of their use was laid before the assembly and voted upon. While volatile and at times disjointed the example is used here to show the importance of total focus on the end goal when considering strategy. Betts had his doubts as to whether strategy is even possible, ...Because strategy is necessary, however, does not mean that it is possible... To skeptics, effective strategy is often an illusion because what happens in the gap between policy objectives and war outcomes is too complex and unpredictable to be manipulated to a specified end. When this is true, war cannot be a legitimate instrument of policy. Even the great Clausewitz had his doubts as to the fullness and effectiveness of strategy, even with a clear focus on the end goals. So these two authors would quite possibly look at the definition proffered above and say that while it is a good rudimentary stab at strategy, if strategy itself is illusive how can one define it? This frustration harkens back to Plato and